Bones 1.16 The Woman In The Tunnel

Discussion of TJ's most popular venture to date!
User avatar
ThyneAlone
TJ Team Validator
Posts: 2710
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:30 am
19
Location: Northwest UK, near Liverpool

Bones 1.16 The Woman In The Tunnel

Post by ThyneAlone »

Soo, not really one of my favourites, because there are so many unpleasant players. The victim herself was a deceitful and serial two-timer, and used at least one of her subjects to lead her to other and more profitable documentary filming work. And, after claiming that she didn’t want to get in the way of her subject, she actually ‘presented’ the second doc. Her fiancé held back the full truth of their relationship, because he felt it damaged his image of himself as a man and humiliated him. Of the two men who taught her to climb, both were dishonest and avaricious, and one of them was a murderer. The social worker was snippy, cynical and dismissive, viewing Marni as purely exploitative, with nothing to offer the subterranean fringe-dwellers. Only the traumatised and mentally ill Harold Overmeyer comes out of it with any credit.

As we commence here we feel that we are moving into the dark, and it turns out not to be just the physical dark, but the dark centre of each human being; what motivates us, what delights us, what do we glean from others and what, fundamentally, is our self-image? It’s a darkness full of gnawing and movements in the corner of our eyes, perhaps somewhere we don’t like to go too often. I’m sure we all have areas ‘beyond the perimeter’ full of primal fears and dangers.

The basic facts are these; the remains at the bottom of a ventilation shaft turn out to be those of Marni Hunter (is the surname significant? Unlikely – can you think of a reason why her fiancé should be called Garfield?!!), an adventurous and well-travelled 24-year-old documentary maker who was filming and studying the underground subculture of the city homeless. In doing so she has chanced to make an amazing discovery; a treasure vault containing priceless relics dating back to the Civil War. As she starts to put together a new documentary about the hidden treasure, the two climbers who have been helping her find out about the treasure and plan to loot the vault. One of them has killed Marni with a climbing axe on one of their forays there. It’s actually unclear whether Marni was in on their plans to steal from the vault – Brennan thinks not – or whether both climbers were complicit in her death – the one who was Marni’s lover seems convincingly horrified, but you never know!

From these bare bones the writers extract an intriguing study of attitudes and relationships, within the team and outside it. Looking at Booth and Brennan first, it’s plain that they identify with Harold and Marni respectively. Brennan sees herself as a passive observer and commentator on aspects of society without condemning it. Like Marni, she is fiercely independent, unbound by social niceties/conventions, possessed of a need to work alone (Tempe actually glances up at Booth a little guiltily as she admits this!) and keen to get the job done, however long she has to absent herself from everyday life to achieve it. Because she understands what Marni was trying to do, she is quick to reprimand Booth for ignoring the community’s hierarchy and dismissing the homeless in an unlikely and out-of-character show of class superiority. Booth, on the other hand, identifies with Harold’s military history and with the numbing, even disturbing, effect on his mind of the killing of innocent people (not to mention his need to live underground as a penance for his actions), and it is he who, in one of their intimate car conversations (now becoming a staple of the series), condemns Brennan’s “glib and cynical” manner when she refers to his ‘brothers-in-arms thing’, quite reasonably resenting the implication that he is using their shared military experience to break down Harold’s resistance to questioning. One day, Booth says, if she wants, he will tell her what he has done; but he suggests “good choice” when she decides not to press him further. It’s clear there is something fairly awful writhing in his darkness.

Back at the lab, there is yet more informative interaction taking place. The look Hodgins gives Zack when he says “those are rhetorical questions, right? I’m not meant to answer” is hilarious. He really does think he is having to go through an educative process every time he talks to Zack. The following quick-fire scenes, where they discover an important and priceless piece of evidence and take it to Goodman for his opinion, are extremely funny. Everyone is trying to avoid taking possession of the item because of the paperwork that goes with it. Even Zack knows not to take it off Hodgins and hand it to Goodman, and Angela is even firmer:

HODGINS: You don’t need me here for this.
ANGELA: Yes, I do.
HODGINS: Why?
ANGELA: Because I’ve not taken possession of this piece of evidence!

The relationships at the lab are warm and friendly. Their family feel has already been emphasised by a montage of not just Brennan, but the entire group putting Marni back together (again – when did these montages start referring to just one individual?), studying the remains and the particles discovered on the items Harold had hidden. It fits perfectly that when Goodman – the dad - is so excited at the value of the artefact that he inadvertently runs off with it and ‘takes possession,’ Hodgins and Angela – the kids - share a joyous and rather complex, one might say well-rehearsed, high five!

It’s quite rare these days to see Angela sitting Brennan down for a heart to heart, but it happened a lot in the old days. This time she is worried about Brennan’s safety. The latter is out of the lab more and more, “chasing bad guys”. Brennan argues that society fears outsiders, but they are not necessarily dangerous. However, Angela points out that if Brennan becomes involved with people things can go too far. Maybe that’s what happened to Marni. In recent seasons we have lost quite a bit of Angela’s instinctive wisdom and insight, and I feel the loss. It’s palpable again in the scene with Harold, as she attempts a sketch of his mysterious ‘blonde’. “I don’t know how to talk to crazy people unless I’m dating them,” she protests to Brennan beforehand, but Brennan knows Angela’s people skills: “Just be honest with him, Ange.” Honesty and straightforwardness has become hugely important coinage in a situation where everyone seems to be hiding something. Marni claimed that the truth can’t be exploitative, but Helen, the social worker, objects that there are “different truths”. Indicating that maybe honesty is a much more complicated matter than it would seem at first glance!

Other general observations:

Montage at the end is a montage too far. One is enough.

Brennan is still constantly badgering Booth for a gun. “A little trust would be nice” she wheedles at the start.

Along with Booth, I am surprised that Brennan is very familiar with ‘Treasure of the Sierra Madre’ (“everyone knows that”) but has not heard of Charlize Theron. What the heck? What’s ‘Treasure of the Sierra Madre’??

It’s a really elegant stroke of the typewriter that makes Goodman 100% relevant to this investigation by the revelation that Angela’s picture of Harold’s dead-eyed blonde is a famous Henry Raeburn painting. And simultaneously proves that Harold has been in the vault. Well done, writers.

Wonderful Angelator! Especially the use of it to marry up all the tunnel routes under the city and plot a route through them.

Brennan instinctively knows that the best way to make the terrified Harold lead them to the perimeter is to remind him how dependent his community is on him. Why isn’t she that perceptive now?

Is there a sly reference to Twin Peaks when Booth throws away his cup in disgust, exploding “Horrible coffee!” Admittedly he’s in the middle of a dispute about the power of jealousy as a motive at the time..that might explain the bad taste in his mouth..

Kyle hit the Duke with the candlestick in the crypt! Brennan didn’t get the joke! Well, I did, but was then confused when someone said ‘Clue’. Why can’t you call it Cluedo like we do?!! ;)

Biggest laugh, for me; Hodgins contacts Brennan to tell her excitedly that he’s found out that Marni must have been in an older tunnel system before she died (her clothes show traces of diamond dust, diamonds having been used in 19th century industrial drilling), and is promptly squashed: “Facts before conclusions, please.” Having registered his useful information, Brennan and Booth hang up on him in a very peremptory manner. Hodgins stares at his phone in disbelief. “Good job, Hodgins,” he mutters sarcastically, “what would we do without you?”

What indeed.
word count: 1498
"We make our lives out of chaos and hope. And love." - Angela Montenegro

User avatar
skftex
TJ Team Validator
Posts: 2306
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:16 pm
18
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Bones 1.16 The Woman In The Tunnel

Post by skftex »

My thoughts on this one!

Zack, Booth and Brennan are being lowered on ropes down a shaft to a tunnel at the beginning, I was wondering, they are in the tunnels several times during the episode, did they do that every time? And I’m assuming back up too? And all the people that live down there, they get in there how? Or did they find a better way in? If so, why didn’t the cops find it in the first place so they wouldn’t have to go down ropes? Since a city worker found the body, wouldn’t the city worker know these people are down there and also how they got there, so they wouldn’t need the ropes?

Brennan shoots at the rats around the body. But wouldn’t that compromise not only the crime scene but the body itself? It’ll have bullet wounds? Because it doesn’t look like she’s that good of a shot and doesn’t hit any of the rats. I can see Booth’s weapon fired review board report now: “Partner shot at rats on dead body.”

Hodgins asking Booth, “Want to see the ratio of fly larvae to Silphidae beetles?”, and sticking them up in Booth’s face when Booth asks him if he was sure about time of death is funny! That is what Booth gets for doubting Hodgins!! Never, ever, ever doubt Hodgins when it comes to analyzing the bugs!!

Hodgins said that time of death was 10 days, when the missing person’s report was filed, but then Booth is questioning the fiancé and asks why he waited 2 days to file the missing person’s report. If she’s been dead 10 days and it matches the missing person’s report, how exactly does Booth know he waited two days? Continuity issue there I guess. :/

I know that Booth thinks that telling Harold that he knows what he’s been through is helpful but Harold is way beyond the things soldiers tell each other to get through what they have to do. Booth doesn’t really understand how Harold got to where he is, he understands why but not how, or Booth would be right there with him. Nothing Booth is going to say is going to help Harold, he needs professional help and he apparently doesn’t want it.

I do like the scene in the car with Booth and Brennan, it was done really well-Brennan has seen a lot of stuff and she doesn’t want to know the things Booth has had to do.

“ I don’t know how to talk to crazy people, unless I’m dating them.” HAHAHA funny Angela line.
Angela is the only one that does something about the light when Harold complains about it being bright. I think that goes a long way in getting Harold to talk to Angela about the “Blonde woman.”

Inductive, reductive, or deductive, they all look at Booth like he’s insane because he uses inductive reasoning and they picked deductive. I wonder if Angela understands it.

I’m glad they let Harold go back to the underground rather than try to force him into a program.

Now for a few things in response to Steph:

ThyneAlone wrote:can you think of a reason why her fiancé should be called Garfield?!!
No, except because you had pointed that out I kept thinking of the cat. He did kind of look like Garfield the cat. President Garfield didn't take office until 1881, and was assassinated so too late for the Civil War. I can't think of any other connection.
ThyneAlone wrote:Along with Booth, I am surprised that Brennan is very familiar with ‘Treasure of the Sierra Madre’ (“everyone knows that”) but has not heard of Charlize Theron. What the heck? What’s ‘Treasure of the Sierra Madre’??
I'm going to assume you are joking about this?
ThyneAlone wrote:Kyle hit the Duke with the candlestick in the crypt! Brennan didn’t get the joke! Well, I did, but was then confused when someone said ‘Clue’. Why can’t you call it Cluedo like we do?!!
Because we Americans would all be wondering what the heck is a CLUEDO. Why stick the pretentious reference to a Latin word in the name when everyone understands why the game is called Clue and I'm willing to bet not many people get the Ludo reference at all. ;-) Though Zack and Brennan would get that part of it. :P
word count: 758
Blessed are they who see beautiful things in humble places where other people see nothing.-Camille Pissarro

User avatar
ThyneAlone
TJ Team Validator
Posts: 2710
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:30 am
19
Location: Northwest UK, near Liverpool

Re: Bones 1.16 The Woman In The Tunnel

Post by ThyneAlone »

Hi Sharon, I'm back from a couple of days away! This is good work you are doing here, I'm enjoying it. A brief response to your last:

Weeeeelll, the Cluedo complaint was a joke.
I mean, obviously we call things different names, we learn, we grow, right? :) Though it did catch me momentarily, as it's not a word I hear a lot; takes about a second to adjust "Aah I know what it means". Btw it's really interesting you caught the Latin reference. I never even thought of it - it's just a name of a game. I like enriching titbits like that - thank you!

However, now don't go all Booth on me, the Sierra Madre bit wasn't a joke. Seriously, never heard of it. Just not part of my cultural reference. Thank the Lord for Google.
word count: 143
"We make our lives out of chaos and hope. And love." - Angela Montenegro

User avatar
skftex
TJ Team Validator
Posts: 2306
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:16 pm
18
Location: Texas
Contact:

Re: Bones 1.16 The Woman In The Tunnel

Post by skftex »

:smile: Steph of course I knew you were joking about the Cluedo thing. ;) I just had to give you a reason because I'm anal that way. HAHAHAHA

Wow, I was sure you were joking about The Treasure of the Sierra Madre but I guess if you don't watch a lot of classic film you wouldn't know it. Though it was of course a book first, most people associate it with the Humphrey Bogart movie. I'm a classic film nut, I know more about movies from the 30s, 40s and 50s than I do about current movies.
word count: 99
Blessed are they who see beautiful things in humble places where other people see nothing.-Camille Pissarro

User avatar
ThyneAlone
TJ Team Validator
Posts: 2710
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 2:30 am
19
Location: Northwest UK, near Liverpool

Re: Bones 1.16 The Woman In The Tunnel

Post by ThyneAlone »

I do like a lot of classic film (though not as much as my film buff son, with a less wide scope than my husband and clearly not on your level!!), and I even go back as far as early 20th century expressionist cinema, but I think it's the genre that's defeated me here - it just isn't my kind of plot. On the 6-hour car journey down to my brother's on Monday, the beloved and I started musing (as one does) on the kind of films and books we like, and it seems that there are certain areas like adventure and detective and the mafia that just don't draw me in (one thing that does limit my viewing and reading is a general antagonism to violence as entertainment), so I don't dabble in them. I mean, just that last sentence erases Indiana Jones, most Philip Marlow noir and the Godfather from my board of experience, but at least I guess I have heard of them! :)

Someone go buy me a DVD player! :P
word count: 179
"We make our lives out of chaos and hope. And love." - Angela Montenegro